Zoning Referendum Results - Liberty Prevails!

I trust that you all had a wonderful Thanksgiving and are now looking forward to Christmas. I expect that most of you are probably already aware of the results of the advisory referendum on zoning, but perhaps some of you are not, so I thought I would send out an update to you all.

The people of Cady have officially requested that the Cady Town Board NOT continue to develop a zoning ordinance.

Will they respect our wishes and abide by the results of the referendum? We'll have to see. The two supervisors had originally said that they would not commit to abide by the results, but Chairman Tully has said that he would.

Remember, they are up for re-election in April, 2019.

Thank you to all of you who turned out to vote on November 6 to formally voice your opinion. Now we must ensure that the Town Board intends to abide by our wishes, or they must be replaced.

Property Taxes vs. Permitting Fees - What's the Difference?

There is a statement in the Cady Zoning Referendum that says "Zoning has no impact on property taxes."

This statement was intentionally inserted into the referendum statement to try and alleviate concerns about the personal cost of zoning to Cady residents.

I already pointed out that per Wisconsin state law, 70.32(1g), the assessor shall consider the effect on the value of the property of any zoning ordinance.

Additionally, according to the Wisconsin Towns Association website:

Town zoning with village powers can be manpower and cost intensive. Both a plan commission and a zoning board of appeals will need to be staffed. The town will bear all costs of ordinance creation and amendment, administration and enforcement. Enforcement in particular includes ordinance prosecutions by the town attorney as well as the initiation of and defense against lawsuits related to the town’s zoning.

Question: How is the Town of Cady going to support these expenses if they do not raise property taxes?

Answer: They'll have to do it through permitting fees and penalties, which is just another name for taxes.

Just say "NO" to Zoning in Cady on November 6.

Our property rights are just too precious to surrender.

Non-binding Advisory Referendum on Zoning

The Cady Town Board has submitted their proposed wording for the non-binding advisory referendum on zoning in Cady. The referendum is scheduled to be on the ballot in Cady for the general election on November 6, 2018.

The referendum is expected to read as follows:

This is a nonbinding question to give the Town Board direction concerning zoning. Zoning has no impact on property taxes. Should the Town of Cady continue to develop a Zoning Ordinance?

Yes

No

This referendum is an advisory referendum. The governing body of the Town of Cady is not legally bound by the results of this advisory referendum.

A "yes" vote would advise the Cady Town Board that you want them to create a Zoning Ordinance.

A "no" vote would advise the Cady Town Board that you would like Cady to continue as it is, without a Zoning Ordinance.

However, regarding the statement on property taxes, Wisconsin 70.32(1g) states that the assessor shall consider the effect on the value of the property of any zoning ordinance under s. 59.692, 61.351, 61.353, 62.231, or 62.233. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/70.32(1g)

Also, according to a Wisconsin court decision in State ex rel. Hensel v. Town of Wilson, while a sale establishes value, the assessment still has to be equal to that on comparable property. Sub. (2) (b) requires the assessor to fix a value before classifying the land; it does not prohibit him from considering the zoning of the property when it is used for some other purpose.

Chairman Mike Tully has publicly stated that he will abide by the results of the referendum. However, supervisors Bob Klanderman and Jim Mikla stated that they may not. They said that they would wait to see the results before deciding. Since they have consistently supported the Title 13 zoning ordinance, it my expectation that they would only intend to abide by the results of the referendum if the people of Cady vote "YES" for zoning. If the people of Cady vote to retain their existing property rights and say "NO" to zoning, the town supervisors may not be willing to abide by the results. Remember, ultimately zoning in Cady will be up to these three individuals, and if two out of three board members decide to implement zoning against our wishes, the use of our private properties will wind up under their control.

It has been my goal all along to have the residents of Cady make our own informed decision as to whether or not to surrender our property rights and submit ourselves to a zoning ordinance. This planned referendum is a rare and incredible opportunity for the people of Cady to clearly make our position known to our town government. Let's not let this opportunity pass us by. Spread the word to all of your friends and neighbors in Cady.

JUST SAY "NO" TO ZONING IN CADY!

Thank you for your continued interest and support. Together, we can keep Cady free.

***** CADY ZONING UPDATE *****

It is my pleasure to bring you some very good news today. Last night, the Town Board decided to move ahead with a town referendum on zoning in Cady. Although the exact wording of the referendum has not yet been determined, it will ask something like "Should the Town of Cady continue to develop a zoning ordinance?" The choices will be "YES" or "NO" and should be on the ballot for the November 2018 election.

Chairman Mike Tully has publicly stated that he will abide by the results of the referendum. However, supervisors Bob Klanderman and Jim Mikla stated that they may not. They said that they would wait to see the results before deciding. Since they have consistently supported the Title 13 zoning ordinance, it my expectation that they would only intend to abide by the results of the referendum if the people of Cady vote "YES" for zoning. If the people of Cady vote to retain their existing property rights and say "NO" to zoning, the town supervisors may not be willing to abide by the results. Remember, ultimately zoning in Cady will be up to these three individuals, and if two out of three board members decide to implement zoning against our wishes, the use of our private properties will wind up under their control.

It has been my goal all along to have the residents of Cady make our own informed decision as to whether or not to surrender our property rights and submit ourselves to a zoning ordinance. This planned referendum is a rare and incredible opportunity for the people of Cady to clearly make our position known to our town government. Let's not let this opportunity pass us by. Spread the word to all of your friends and neighbors in Cady.

Thank you for your continued interest and support. Together, we can keep Cady free.

Cady Zoning Poll

Create your own user feedback survey

Just Say "NO" to Zoning in Cady

Cady residents and landowners,

Please sign this online petition to preserve property rights in Cady, WI.

Preserve Property Rights in Cady, Wisconsin

What if the Founding Fathers had been Grandfathered In?

Benjamin Franklin once famously said “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Imagine for a moment if our founding fathers, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, instead of pledging their “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” to the cause of freedom & liberty, had accepted an offer from King George to be “grandfathered in”, and therefore exempted from the burdens that the British empire was laying on the backs of the colonists. The king could have said, “Don’t worry gentlemen, this won’t affect you. You will be grandfathered in, and these laws will only affect the people who will be coming to the colonies after you. After all, we want to keep the colonies ‘English’, don’t we?” Do you think they would have even considered such an offer? It could have saved them a great deal of difficulties, to be sure. It would have been much easier on them than to fight the war for independence.

When it comes to laws that infringe on our liberties, the offer to be “grandfathered in” is an enticement to get us to go along with them despite finding them burdensome or repulsive because we would be negatively impacted otherwise. By promising to exempt us from the enforcement or consequences of not complying with the rules, we become less concerned because we believe that the burdens are only meant for others. It is much easier to approve of these new rules when we are told that they are not meant for us. However, while others are suffering from these difficulties that we’ve allowed, we still have to find a way to sleep at night.

Since the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776, think of all the men and women of America who have selflessly sacrificed their lives and limbs for the sake of preserving the liberties that we enjoy and even take for granted. American colonists stood up to the most formidable army in the world, with little chance of success, just for the hope of securing freedom and liberty for their children and future generations. Many, if not most, knew full well that their chances of returning home and peacefully living out the rest of their lives were slim to none, yet they chose to sacrifice themselves for the sake of others… for OUR sakes. To them, it was that important. Americans have engaged in conflicts around the world, spilling blood and treasure, to retain and even spread these freedom and liberties.

How important are those sacrifices to us, now?

As we look forward to the celebration of our American Independence in just a couple of weeks, we should think about those men and women, and the sacrifices that they made. Because they were willing to pledge their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to preserve our freedoms and liberties, now all we have to do is keep them, and not let just them slip away like some trivial relic that has lost its value. We don’t have to risk our lives, we just have to pay attention. We don’t have to resort to violence, we just have to stand up and speak out. We can’t let liberty become a meaningless cliché which we only pay lip service when talking about American ideals without demeaning the shed blood of those who sacrificed all that they had to ensure that we would remain free to live our lives as we thought best for ourselves and our children.

The loss of our property rights in Cady is not yet a foregone conclusion, but it will be if we don’t do something now. We need to tell our town government that we appreciate what they do to keep our roads clear and functional, ensure that we have access to emergency services, and take as little as necessary from us to provide for the services that we have requested. However, we also need to tell our town government that we will not limit ourselves to two garage sales per year, or ask permission to start a home business, or abstain from setting up a camper for the summer, or cut down a tree, or raise up a shed. We need to tell our town government that we do love Cady just the way that it is; BEAUTIFUL AND FREE; and we will do everything within our power to keep it that way. Please be sure to come to the Cady Public Hearing tomorrow to tell them how you feel. They need to know, and they need to hear it from you

Cady Zoning - Where Are We Now & What Can We Do?

I wanted to send out a message that lets the people of Cady know just where we are in the process regarding Comprehensive Zoning in the Town of Cady.

PRESENT

Currently, Cady is among approximately 245 towns (~19.5%) in Wisconsin that do not have comprehensive zoning. This data is from 2010, but in a call to the Wisconsin DOA, I was told that this is the latest data and these numbers have not changed significantly since then.

The Cady Plan Commission received a new draft Zoning Code and proposed zoning map from the WCWRPC on May 01, 2018. They reviewed it at the May 17, 2018 Plan Commission meeting, and voted to approve it and send it to the Town Board with a recommendation to have a Public Hearing and to have the Town Board adopt it afterwards... immediately afterwards if they wished. A Pubic Hearing was scheduled for June 21, 2018 and notice was published in the Sun-Argus on May 31, 2018.

WHAT'S NEXT?

According to Wisconsin state law, Chapter 60.61(4)(b), the Plan Commission and Town Board should now be allowing ample opportunity for public involvement. The adoption process for zoning is spelled out pretty simply in UW Steven's Point Zoning Ordinances guidance document. See the four (4) steps on page three under the "ADOPTION" section.

1. Plan Commission prepares a draft with assistance of legal counsel and advisory/consulting group.
• NOTE: this was completed 5/1/18
2. A public hearing is scheduled with opportunities for public participation prior to the public hearing recommended to ensure that the ordinance is understood and accepted by the public. 
• NOTE: The public hearing has been scheduled for June 21, 2018, but the only opportunity for public participation that we have been provided is an invitation in the notice of the public hearing: "Written comments on the draft ordinance and zoning map should be sent to the Cady Plan Commission c/o Clerk Shelly Ninneman at 283 CTY RD NN, Wilson, WI 54027. Written comments must be received before June 21, 2018"
• This is unfortunate, because it does not allow for comments to be made publicly, only privately to the Plan Commission through the Town Clerk.
3. In response to public comments, the Plan Commission may modify the draft zoning ordinance, or forward it to the Town Board to adopt. If significant changes are made as a result of public comments or recommendations from the Town Board, another Public Hearing must be held.
• This is why it is so very important that anyone who has an opinion on this proposed zoning code or proposed map, come to the Public Hearing on June 21. This is the primary opportunity that the town government has provided to the people of Cady to have input into the code.
• After this Public Hearing, the Plan Commission has the authority to either make changes or to move on to Item #4 below and submit the code to the Town Board.
4. The Town Board can now adopt the zoning code following another Public Hearing. After which, they will need to send it to the county for final approval.

To summarize, at a minimum, the next steps are:

1. Plan Commission Public Hearing, June 21, 2018
2. Plan Commission to submit final draft to Town Board
3. Town Board Public Hearing TBD following Class 2 Notice
4. Town Board to adopt code and submit to the County
5. St. Croix County to approve

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Right now, the people of Cady need to prepare for the Public Hearing. It is the only opportunity that we have been given to have any public input into this zoning code.

1. Reading the a new draft Zoning Code and proposed zoning map and ensuring that you understand it and what it means for you, your children, and for the Town of Cady.
2. List your questions and concerns and be prepared to bring them up to the Plan Commission. 
3. Tell everyone that you know who has any interest in the Town of Cady to do the same. People who do not voice any opposition or criticism to the Plan Commission or Town Board will be assumed to be in support of this.
4. Make sure that your questions are satisfactorily answered and addressed at the Public Hearing.
5. Make sure that the Plan Commission and Town Board members know exactly how you feel about the zoning code, or they will make assumptions about how you feel. Leave nothing to the imagination.
6. Pray for our town government that they will have the strength and wisdom to do what is right, in the eyes of God and those who have put their trust in them.

I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. (1Timothy 2:1-2)

You can also contact the Town Officials and Plan Commission by going to the Town website, http://townofcady.com/. Their phone numbers are published there. However, for your comments and concerns to be public, you will have to attend the Public Hearing on June 21 and speak out. It's the best hope that we have right now to keep Cady free.

God bless you, and may God bless Cady,

Wisconsin Chapter 60 - Is It the Law or Just a Good Idea?

In last night's town board meeting, I asked the Town Board where they believed that they were in the process of implementing zoning. They, and the Plan Commission clearly indicated that they believe that all that is left is to have a Public Hearing, allowing some input from town people up until that time, and then adopt the ordinance. The Plan Commission chairman, Ken Greiber, while submitting his update to the Town Board, even stated that they recommend that "the Town Board adopt the code following the public hearing, and that they could even schedule a special meeting immediately after the Public Hearing to adopt the ordinance".

When I stated that Wisconsin Chapter 60 requires two public hearings, one of which is to occur prior to the Plan Commission submitting the final draft to the Town Board, no one on the board or the Plan Commission seemed to be aware of that. I recommended that they seek some legal counsel to inform them of the rules.

Per Wisconsin Chapter 60

60.61(4)(b) requires that “the town zoning committee shall develop a preliminary report and hold a public hearing on the report before submitting a final report to the town board. The town zoning committee shall give notice of the public hearing on the preliminary report and of the time and place of the public hearing on the report by a class 2 notice under ch. 985.”

60.61(4)(b) then requires that “If the town zoning committee makes a substantial change in its report following the public hearing, it shall hold another public hearing on the report.”

60.61(4)(b) continued: “After the final report of the town zoning committee is submitted to the town board, the board may adopt an ordinance under sub. (2) following a public hearing held by the board on the proposed ordinance. The town board shall give notice of the public hearing on the proposed ordinance and of the time and place of the public hearing on the ordinance by a class 2 notice under ch. 985.”

60.61(4)(b) continued: “If the proposed ordinance has the effect of changing the allowable use of any property, the notice shall include either a map showing the property affected by the ordinance or a description of the property affected by the ordinance and a statement that a map may be obtained from the town board.”

It is also recommended, in the document provided by Supervisor Mikla, "UWSP Zoning Ordinance Guide", section on ADOPTION, “Opportunities for public participation prior to the public hearing are usually necessary to ensure that the ordinance is understood and accepted by the public.”

Zoning Regulations vs. Property Rights

It is the goal of the Cady Liberty Caucus to preserve our natural rights to Life, Liberty, and Property for all landowners and residents here in Cady, Wisconsin. We do this because if the rights of any one of us are lost, they are lost for all of us.

Today, Cady is one of the several towns in the state of Wisconsin that are still free from zoning regulations. General zoning is optional in Wisconsin and is not required by state law. It never has been.

Right now, the Cady town government is working to implement zoning in Cady this summer. They assume that if you do not protest against it, that you fully approve of it. The zoning code that they are receiving from the Plan Commission will require existing Major Home Businesses in Cady to go through the Conditional Use Permitting process, and be subjected to annual inspections. There will be limitations on "animal units per acre", no more than 2 garage sales per year, and limitations on the number of days that you can have an RV/Camper parked on your property, just to name a few.

I have argued since 2012 that the adoption of a zoning ordinance in the Town of Cady will result a significant loss of property rights, which will be surrendered to the Town Board. The Town Board has adamantly claimed that "no one is taking away your property rights", while they forge ahead in their efforts to implement town zoning. This statement is patently and provably false. Evidently, the Town Board doesn't really understand what "rights" are and how they are violently assailed by governments through zoning regulations. 

In the absence of local zoning regulations, a landowner can generally use their land as they wish on their own property without any serious concern that the activity is either forbidden or requiring the express, written permission of the town government. All uses are considered to be permissible as long as they don't harm the surrounding properties or people nearby. You have a natural, unalienable "right" to use your property as you wish (the pursuit of happiness), without government interference. In fact, government has a duty to secure this right, as clearly stated in our Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed... (emphasis mine)

What a general zoning ordinance does is reverse this relationship. It divides the land up into "zones", each of which has a list of "permitted" uses. These limited uses are now deemed a "property right", issued by the governing authorities, and all other uses are subject to review and approval based on certain specific conditions being met by the landowner. These conditional uses are legally no longer considered a "right" of the property owner, but are conditional "privileges" granted (or rescinded) by the governing authorities.

In Rainbow Springs Golf Co., Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago, 2005 WI App 163, 284 Wis. 2d 519, 702 N.W.2d 40, the court decided that a "Conditional Use Permit is NOT" a "property right", but rather a "zoning tool" of the municipality, and, therefore, it may be taken away by without any compensation to the landowner.

These "Conditional Uses" that the municipality is usually willing to allow if all of the necessary conditions are met, are also expressly listed in the zoning code. Any other uses that you can ever imagine that are not specifically listed as either a "permitted" or "conditional" use are considered "forbidden" by the governing authority and cannot legally be engaged in whatsoever without actually going through the process of changing the zoning code to have it added as a permitted or conditional use.

Therefore, under zoning, you no longer have the "right" to decide for yourself how your property should best be used to suit you or even your neighborhood. That right has been "appropriated" by the local governing authorities, with or without your consent. These zoning codes are NOT put to a vote by the people, but to a vote by the Town Board only. These three people will decide whether you retain the natural right to decide how to use your property, or whether they will now take that right for themselves. If that is not "taking away your property rights", I'm hard pressed to imagine what is.

There is a Town Board meeting on Monday, June 4, at 7:30PM where they intend to "discuss and possibly act on the plan commission update", with an opportunity for public comments at the beginning of the meeting. If you cherish your right to use your property to run a business, have garage sales, manage animals, or just to fulfill you dreams, then now would be the time to stand up and say so, or the Town Board will assume that you would rather surrender to them. If only a few of us are willing to stand up for the rights of the whole town, the chances of success are slim. However, if enough of us stand up and let the Town Board know that we will not surrender our rights so easily, perhaps Cady can continue to remain free.

May 2018 Cady Plan Commission Meeting

The Cady Plan Commission (P.C.) held their meeting last night to discuss the new draft of their zoning ordinance, Title 13. There were 10 Cady residents in attendance (besides those on the Plan Commission and the Town Clerk), all of which are included as recipients of this email. So please, if any of the following information is inaccurate, let me know right away and I will be glad to make the necessary corrections. However, some of what I have to say are purely based on my perceptions and are simply my opinions.

The meeting began on time, but immediately, the P.C. Chairman, Ken Greiber, took what I would call an adversarial posture by stating that this is the time for public comments, and once the public comments portion of the meeting was over, there would be no more public comment allowed because "you are here to listen and we are here to discuss" (this is a quote to the best of my memory). It was clear to me that the P.C. was willing to tolerate our presence because they had to, not because they were interested in what we might have to say.

The first resident to speak brought up a rather long list of concerns regarding the proposed ordinance. Her primary concern was in regards to the apparent divergence from the town's Comprehensive Plan which emphasizes the promotion of agricultural activities in Cady. She pointed out that the proposed zoning ordinance list of "permitted uses" is much shorter than the list of "conditional uses", especially as they relate to agricultural uses.

There were questions and concerns from several other town residents as well regarding

• Accessory Dwellings
• Burden of obtaining "conditional use" permits, including long timeframes
• Additional town bureaucracy in the addition of a Zoning Administrator (1) and Appeals Board (5)
• Limits on garage sales (2 per year) - is this really a problem in Cady?
• "Animal Units" not defined in the codes
• All non-commercial lots are planned to be zoned "R-1 Rural Residential" without input from property owners
• Burden of Proof on property owners to prove non-compliances pre-existed the ordinance
• How non-compliances are going to be investigated, policed, and enforced

It was suggested to the P.C. board that perhaps the land owners might have the opportunity to choose for themselves which zoning district their property would be subjected to, rather than just automatically zoning everyone to R-1 Residential and then requiring them to go through the burden and expense of having their property re-zoned later. They are considering their options for how to communicate to the land owners that they can submit a request to have their property subjected to a particular zoning district before the ordinance and map are adopted by the town. We'll have to see what they ultimately decide to do.

Following public comment, which lasted for approximately 35 minutes, the P.C. members discussed the ordinance among themselves. The topics of their discussion were primarily limited to the following:

• Talk to Eric Anderson of West Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (WCWRPC) regarding incorporating some of the concerns of the town residents
• They believed that they could still vote to adopt the ordinance even though it may not be in it's final form yet
• If residents wanted to choose their zoning district, the deadline would have to be at the Public Hearing
• They believe that they have to work towards a timeline of having the Public Hearing announcement posted in time to have the hearing by June 21.
• They believe that they are ready to recommend to the Town Board that the ordinance be formally adopted.

A motion was made by Bob Klanderman to approve the ordinance, subject to the discussed planned changes (which there is no way of knowing what the P.C. notes say regarding these changes), and seconded by Brian Wang. Motion passed.

A motion was made by Bob Klanderman to recommend to the Town Board that the ordinance, subject to the discussed planned changes, be adopted after the public hearing. Motion passed and the meeting was adjourned.

After the meeting was adjourned, one of the Cady residents respectfully expressed a great deal of concern that the P.C. thought that it was acceptable to approve the ordinance and recommend that the board adopt it before the July Town Board meeting, even though it is not yet completed and the Cady property owners have not even had a chance to read it and comment on it. It was pointed out that they were continuing with their past behaviors of trying to force this through the system without taking the necessary time and actions to ensure that it was done right, with the appropriate involvement of the people of Cady. Ken Greiber was noticeably frustrated and said "What is the right way?" as if this was the only way to do it.

If things proceed according to the P.C.'s wishes, there will be a Public Hearing around June 21, 2018 with a board meeting following in which the proposed zoning code will be adopted. After this, it will have to go to the County for review and approval.

I urge all Cady residents to review this new draft zoning ordinance and the corresponding map. Consider the restrictions that the Plan Commission is expecting you to live under and the amount of land-use control that you would be surrendering to the town government. If you have questions or concerns, do not hesitate to contact your public officials who are responsible for this ordinance. Their names and phone numbers are listed below for your convenience.

CADY PLAN COMMISSION:

Chairman:  Ken Greiber  715-772-4570
Mike Fitzjarrell  715-772-3259
Bob Klanderman  715-698-2384

Mike Ellefson  715-772-4586

Brain Wang  715-772-3186

CADY TOWN BOARD:

Chairman:  Mike Tully  715-772 4578
Supervisor: Bob Klanderman  715-698-2384
Supervisor:  Jim Mikla – 715-556-8816

If you are interested in helping to resist this ordinance, whether you want to change it or abolish it, please email me or leave a comment below. If you stand with us, we will stand with you.

"Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." - John Adams

St. Croix County Referendum - Change the 1st Amendment? NO WAY!

Regarding the St. Croix County Referendum on the April 03 ballot, it is the position of the Cady Liberty Caucus that if anyone wishes to effectively get the money out of politics, what must first be done is to significantly reduce the power of government to affect businesses. Take that power out of government and there will no longer be any influence for businesses to purchase, and less opportunity for corruption.

Therefore, a constitutional amendment is really not needed. What is needed is for the federal government to operate within the enumerated powers already established by the constitution.



The referendum is as follows:

“Shall the County of St Croix adopt the following resolution? RESOLVED, that “We the People” of the County of St Croix, Wisconsin, seek to reclaim democracy from the expansion of corporate personhood rights and the corrupting influence of unregulated political contributions and spending. We stand with communities across the country to support passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution stating: 1. Only human beings are endowed with constitutional rights ─ not corporations, unions, nonprofits or other artificial entities, and 2. Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting speech.”

There is an excellent editorial in the Hudson Star Observer on this referendum "Viewpoint: We don't need a First Amendment change".

The wording of the referendum itself shows the author's ignorance of our system of government. It says "RESOLVED, that “We the People” of the County of St Croix, Wisconsin, seek to reclaim democracy from the expansion of corporate personhood rights and the corrupting influence of unregulated political contributions and spending." Someone should have stayed awake in civics class. Then, they would know that Section 4 of the US Constitution states "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." A "democracy", which is a tyranny of the majority over the minority, was soundly rejected by the founding fathers in favor of a representative republic.

The Cady Liberty Caucus is recommending a "NO" vote on this St. Croix County Referendum.

Bill Reusch for St. Croix Board of Supervisors - Dist. 19

The Spring Election is on April 3, and there are several important elections and referendums on the ballot that could impact life, liberty, and property in the Town of Cady.

First of all, there is the Sr. Croix County Board of Supervisors. The Cady Liberty Caucus is endorsing Bill Reusch for this seat against the incumbent, William Peavey.

William Peavey's voting record is available here: William Peavey Votes

• Has a history of approving budget increases
• Voted for the purchase of land in Baldwin for new county maintenance facility
• Supports spending 10s of millions of dollars on bicycle/pedestrian trail
• Supports the county wide mass transit planning/study

I don't know where William Peavey stands on the discussion of making St. Croix county a sanctuary county or on the "living wage" idea, but it is clear that he is more interested in spending other people's money than he is in preserving liberty and personal property.

The Cady Liberty Caucus encourages you to go and vote for Bill Reusch on April 3, 2018.

Wisconsin Supreme Court - 2018 Primary Election February, 20, 2018

There is another election coming up next week. This time it is a primary election for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Sitting Justice Michael Gableman did not file to seek re-election. Three candidates have filed to run for the seat being vacated by Justice Gableman. All three candidates will be on the ballot on Tuesday's primary, and the two candidates who receive the most votes will advance to the general election which will be held on April 3, 2018.

Rebecca Dallet

· Dallet was first elected to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court in 2008 and won re-election in 2014. As of the 2018 election, she still holds the seat. Dallet's previous experience includes 11 years as a prosecutor in the offices of the Milwaukee County District Attorney and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin as well as three years spent teaching law at Marquette University.

· In her June 2017 announcement speech, Dallet pointed to her past experience: "I have the right experience to return independence and balance to what has become an increasingly partisan Supreme Court." Dallet's campaign website argues that she has "spent my career, first as a prosecutor, and now as a judge, working to make our community safer" and identifies the economy, crime, healthcare, and criminal justice law as areas of dissatisfaction, arguing that Dallet is "prepared to fight and represent our values on day one."

· Dallet has received endorsements from former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler, former Gov. Tony Earl (D), Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Lisa Stark, and Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm (D).

· Watch interview with Rebecca Dallet on Wisconsin Eye

· Stated that a police search of a black man was acceptable because Diggins was leaning against the wall for five minutes “with no real obvious purpose for being there.” She sentenced him to two years in prison and two years of extended supervision.

The District 1 Court of Appeals unanimously threw out the ruling in 2013, finding prosecutors’ claims that there was reasonable suspicion of drug dealing “beyond thin.”

“More than mere presence (i.e. hanging out) in a public place is required for reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot,” Judge Joan Kessler wrote for the court.

Michael Screnock

· Screnock was first appointed to the Sauk County Circuit Court by Gov. Scott Walker (R) in 2015 and was elected to a full term in 2016. Screnock's previous experience includes time spent in private practice and, prior to earning his law degree, in municipal management.

· In his June 2017 announcement speech, Screnock referred to his stance on the role of the judiciary: "I share ... the belief that it is the role of a judge to say what the law is and not what it should be...Judges must respect the different roles of the court and Legislature and should not legislate from the bench." Screnock's campaign website argues that his "experience as a judge adds to the experience I gained as a local government official and an attorney, and uniquely prepares me for service on our state’s highest court." Screnock describes his judicial philosophy as a belief that "the role of a judge or justice is to interpret and apply the law, not rewrite the law" and that it is "important that the judicial branch serve as the stable branch of our government."

· Screnock has received endorsements from Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices Daniel Kelly, Michael Gableman, and Rebecca Bradley, as well as former Justices David Prosser and Jon Wilcox

· Watch interview with Michael Screnock on Wisconsin Eye

· Michael Screnock was arrested and ticketed for trespassing and obstructing officers twice in 1989 when he participated in large protests at a Madison abortion clinic. He reached plea deals that dropped the obstructing citations and required him to perform community service for the trespassing charges, according to Screnock and public records.

“In the context of my life, it’s not something I’ve ever regretted doing,” Screnock said.

Tim Burns

· An attorney with experience in insurance-related law, Burns has not previously run for elected office.

· In his May 2017 announcement speech, Burns referred to dissatisfaction with the Wisconsin Supreme Court as a factor motivating his run: "For the past 40 years, I've watched special interests chip away at the impartiality of our courts and it has got to stop."[6] Burns' campaign website argues that "this race isn't about Tim, it's about you and your rights" and identifies Burns' priorities if elected as voting policy, environmental regulations, and business regulations.[7]

· Burns has received endorsements from Bernie Sanders-aligned group Our Revolution, former Supreme Court candidate JoAnne Kloppenburg, and Rep. Mark Pocan (D).

· Watch interview with Tim Burns on Wisconsin Eye

· Burns — who is advertising that he's a Democrat in the officially nonpartisan race — thinks the state’s high court has titled its decisions to corporations instead of the average person.

This isn’t normal. Typically, court candidates avoid overtly stating their political affiliation or directly talking about issues that might come before them as justices — although they often provide hints about their leanings.

Please review all three candidates and choose the one that is most likely to serve in a manner that ensures that the state constitution is supported and defended. The candidate that values justice for all and will work to see that the natural rights of Wisconsin's resident's life, liberty, and property are protected equally and diligently.

We hope to see you at the polls.